Almost everyone
can think of something they would like to change in the U.S.
Constitution. Some would like to update it to fit new technologies and
evolving social mores. Others think the Supreme Court has
illegitimately “updated” it too much already, and would like to restore
its original meaning. Either way, it is always tempting to invoke
Article V to amend the Constitution — to “fix" it, or “restore" it, or
“improve" it. But, on the other hand, there is a substantial risk to
tinkering with the Constitution: many amendments seem to have
unintended consequences. And calling a convention for proposing
amendments is even riskier, because it has never been done before — and
it might inadvertently put the entire constitutional structure up for
grabs. Is it worth the risk? Should the states call a convention to
amend the Constitution?
Presented in partnership with the National Constitution Center
Presented in partnership with the National Constitution Center
Source.
No comments:
Post a Comment